+-

+-Recent Topics

[Clans] Team Beatz vrs. Team Mamba Report thread by beaTz- Today at 01:38:29 am
[General Discussion ] GRAN CW Clan Sadistic vs Clan Xtre- by Microtour-1 November 17, 2018, 03:56:31 pm
[Support Center] TrueS- dropped and reported game by sosimpo November 17, 2018, 03:41:28 pm
[General Discussion ] Team Diablo vs Team Pablo - CLAN SADISTIC TORNEO INTERNO by TealSilverSteal November 17, 2018, 02:45:35 pm
[Clans] Clan Pro] by Puppy November 15, 2018, 10:48:43 pm

+-Season Info

SCW Season 8
Location: Op UGL@USWEST
Open: Oct 13 - Nov 25
RankPlayerRecord
1 GanGstEr]JoSe.42-7
2 GoldSCV68-20
3 shuttle-67-32
4 Xtre-Bxer45-28
5 Xtre-Mamba35-8

Prize Pool:
RankModePrize
11v1$200

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 
Forgot your password?

+-Stats

Members
Total Members: 970
Latest: Mafia-CracK
New This Month: 10
New This Week: 1
New Today: 1
Stats
Total Posts: 6154
Total Topics: 544
Most Online Today: 187
Most Online Ever: 386
(October 30, 2018, 01:18:58 am)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 151
Total: 152

Author Topic: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates  (Read 12070 times)

preMier

  • Supporter
  • Reaver
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • 2049 @ USWEST
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #240 on: August 14, 2018, 09:20:58 am »
Oh look, two noobs which i raped alot. I bet i got bigger bankaccount combined than you guys, haha!

Person X claims quantity of collective imaginary currency makes Person X a superior individual compared to Person Y who is superior at Activity A. Person X does not understand that collective imaginary currency and Person X are separate things and neither can change the core essence of the other. Nor does quantity of collective imaginary currency have relevance to Person Y being superior at Activity A.
« Last Edit: August 14, 2018, 09:23:25 am by preMier »

Momo85

  • Supporter
  • Zealot
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #241 on: August 14, 2018, 09:25:28 am »
Oh look, two noobs which i raped alot. I bet i got bigger bankaccount combined than you guys, haha!

Person X claims quantity of collective imaginary currency makes Person X a superior individual compared to Person Y who is superior at Activity A. Person X does not understand that collective imaginary currency and Person X are separate things and neither can change the core essence of the other. Nor does quantity of collective imaginary currency have relevance to Person Y being superior at Activity A.

i understand now , u are a real brain damage ;(

johnwick

  • Broodling
  • *
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #242 on: August 14, 2018, 11:32:34 am »
Jose when will you be online

preMier

  • Supporter
  • Reaver
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • 2049 @ USWEST
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #243 on: August 14, 2018, 12:49:41 pm »
can someone who knows JoSe. send him a message ^^

TealSilverSteal

  • Reaver
  • *******
  • Posts: 305
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #244 on: August 14, 2018, 02:21:44 pm »
Premier, shut up.... dont act smart.

preMier

  • Supporter
  • Reaver
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • 2049 @ USWEST
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #245 on: August 14, 2018, 02:58:42 pm »
Premier, shut up.... dont act smart.
Dano, shut up.... dont act dumb.

TealSilverSteal

  • Reaver
  • *******
  • Posts: 305
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #246 on: August 14, 2018, 03:05:26 pm »
Let me try again, shut up nerd.

preMier

  • Supporter
  • Reaver
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • 2049 @ USWEST
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #247 on: August 14, 2018, 03:23:37 pm »
Let me try again, shut up nerd.
'
you forgot to say please.

Mamba

  • Zealot
  • ****
  • Posts: 161
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #248 on: August 14, 2018, 05:59:37 pm »
^this is why RvR is bullshit and always has been

Sure it sucks that I got Zerg 5 out of 7 games... But its my responsibility to win the game in front of me. If i can't figure out a way to win 1 more of those Zerg games than I did, I have no business advancing in this tournament. I had plenty of opportunities.

Momo85

  • Supporter
  • Zealot
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #249 on: August 14, 2018, 06:06:06 pm »
Welcome to the "official SCW season 6 Playoffs thread".


When?
  • Season ends July 29, 23:59:59/11:59:59 PM website time(GMT-4). Playoffs officially start August 3 at 2:00 PM/14:00 Website time(GMT-4). Players can play their matches before this date if their opponent is online. The playoffs start officially on August 3 because of the different time zones players are in.

Prizes
  • 1st place reward = $600
  • 2nd place reward = $250
  • 3rd place reward = $100

Bracket information
  • Top 8 ranks are seeded in playoffs.
  • Playoffs Bracket. Click "here" for Example with info.
  • All sets are Best of 7. Main bracket winner has to win one Bo9 set in grand final to win tournament. If Losers final winner wins Bo9 in Grand final, the score resets to zero. The Grand finalists will then have to play a Bo7 to determine the winner

Entries:


Rules
  • All matches will be played on the OFFICIAL SCW 6 maps. (can be found here)
  • All matches are RANDOM vs RANDOM, unless both players agree it is oke to pick.
  • Leaving at the start, unless it can be proven your opponent picked a race without an agreement, or started while you were "away from keyboard", will results in a loss.
  • Disconnecting will result in a loss, unless it can be proven in the replay that you were winning up until the point of disconnection. Players are to provide evidence or a witness that their enemy disconnected. Make a screenshot of your opponent disconnecting.
  • NO MIND CONTROL ON WORKERS
  • NO HARD BM ON THE PLAYOFF THREADS. SOFT BM IS ALLOWED.
  • Report and upload matches in the report thread.

Other info:
  • Please use this thread to let other players know when you are online and when you can be online. Please plan your matches together with the other players.
  • Second post contains match log
  • Hosted by PreMier & Live.swOrD
  • Special thanks to donators: Momo85, Live.SwOrD, PreMier, and Anonymous donator.

If Losers final winner wins Bo9 in Grand final, the score resets to zero. The Grand finalists will then have to play a Bo7 to determine the winner


its bullshit rule , fucking retrad

Momo85

  • Supporter
  • Zealot
  • *
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #250 on: August 14, 2018, 06:09:47 pm »
just make final bo 9 or bo 11 , no re bo7

johnwick

  • Broodling
  • *
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #251 on: August 14, 2018, 06:12:38 pm »
Jace can you scrap this rule. its hard enough for anyone to beat brain in 5 games, let alone 9

preMier

  • Supporter
  • Reaver
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • 2049 @ USWEST
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #252 on: August 14, 2018, 06:29:23 pm »
Did as Sword instructed me to do on the bracket reset. Bracket/score reset is common in a lot of esports for the grand final. Winner bracket grand finalist did not lose a set and is up a bo7. The loser grand finalist is down a Bo7. Winner grand finalist has to keep the advantage gained from winning winners bracket. Putting them on even grounds is unfair. But if Sword wants to reduce the number of matches for the Grand Final I am ok with that. I am also ok with making it a Bo7 into Bo7. I am ok with removing the two set rule for loser grand finalist if Sword wants to. It will be ehat sword wants it to be.

VvnJustin

  • Broodling
  • *
  • Posts: 14
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #253 on: August 14, 2018, 07:40:44 pm »
Did as Sword instructed me to do on the bracket reset. Bracket/score reset is common in a lot of esports for the grand final. Winner bracket grand finalist did not lose a set and is up a bo7. The loser grand finalist is down a Bo7. Winner grand finalist has to keep the advantage gained from winning winners bracket. Putting them on even grounds is unfair. But if Sword wants to reduce the number of matches for the Grand Final I am ok with that. I am also ok with making it a Bo7 into Bo7. I am ok with removing the two set rule for loser grand finalist if Sword wants to. It will be ehat sword wants it to be.

it should always be bo9 into bo9 or bo7 into bo7, should the bracket be reset by the person coming from losers bracket. i've never seen set 1 of GF have a different number of games than set 2 of GF, that would just add unnecessary confusion.

preMier

  • Supporter
  • Reaver
  • *
  • Posts: 468
  • 2049 @ USWEST
    • View Profile
Re: SCW season 6 1VS1 Playoffs: Information, discussion & updates
« Reply #254 on: August 14, 2018, 08:06:51 pm »
Did as Sword instructed me to do on the bracket reset. Bracket/score reset is common in a lot of esports for the grand final. Winner bracket grand finalist did not lose a set and is up a bo7. The loser grand finalist is down a Bo7. Winner grand finalist has to keep the advantage gained from winning winners bracket. Putting them on even grounds is unfair. But if Sword wants to reduce the number of matches for the Grand Final I am ok with that. I am also ok with making it a Bo7 into Bo7. I am ok with removing the two set rule for loser grand finalist if Sword wants to. It will be ehat sword wants it to be.

it should always be bo9 into bo9 or bo7 into bo7, should the bracket be reset by the person coming from losers bracket. i've never seen set 1 of GF have a different number of games than set 2 of GF, that would just add unnecessary confusion.
Bo7 was chosen because of all prior matches being Bo7 and the initial difference being "A bo7 up/down" on the opponent. But you raise a fair point. Alternatives could be giving the Winner grand finalist a lead over the Loser finalist like they did with early SC2 MLG. Any the main point is that the Winner grand finalist should have an advantage.

 

Powered by EzPortal